Site Logo

Hong v The Queen [2020] NSWCCA 225

appeal against sentence — attempting to possess commercial quantity of unlawfully imported border controlled drug — original sentence imposed 15 years’ imprisonment with 10 year non-parole period — offence related to nearly 25 kilograms of pure heroin — guilty plea — s 16A(2)(g) — sentencing judge gave 25% discount for facilitating administration of justice — nothing was said about utilitarian discount for plea of guilty — Xiao v R was decided 6 years later — nature and circumstances — s 16A(2)(a) — offender’s role fell between principal and courier — offender and co-offender were critical participants in actual importation of drugs but also in early stages of intended distribution — offender had been entrusted with responsibility of managing consignment of very large amount of heroin — offender was more senior of two offenders and of greater importance in drug operation — offender possessed important documents on arrival and communicated with Malaysia and Myanmar — rehabilitation — s 16A(2)(n) — offender has undertaken courses while in custody and been employed as a clerk — in December 2018 offender was found in possession of USB containing sensitive material linked to his work and violent pornography while imprisoned — USB of limited relevance in re-sentencing exercise — leave to appeal granted — appeal allowed — sentence quashed — offender sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment with 9 year non-parole period
The CSD acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as First Australians and recognises their culture, history, diversity and their deep connection to the land. We acknowledge that we are on the land of the traditional owners and pay respects to Elders past and present.

© 2024 The National Judicial College of Australia (NJCA). Powered by

Privacy Policy|Terms and Conditions