Site Logo

Xiao v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 4

appeal against sentence — prohibited conduct by person in possession of inside information offences contrary to ss 1043A(1)(d) and 1311(1) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — joint commission offence contrary to s 11.2A of Commonwealth Criminal Code — original sentence imposed 8 years and 3 months’ imprisonment with 5 year and 6 month non-parole period — during ASIC investigation offender permitted to travel to China to complete a doctoral thesis exam and required to return — offender failed to return and subsequently arrested in Hong Kong and extradited to Australia — guilty plea — s 16A(2)(g) — in providing for guilty plea to be taken into account in sentencing, legislature encouraged guilty pleas to provide evidence for remorse or contrition and to assist in administration of justice — in Federal sentencing proceedings, sentencing judge is entitled to take utilitarian value of guilty plea into account — to the extent that Tyler v The Queen, R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 and subsequent line of cases provide to the contrary, they should not be followed — desirable for sentencing judge to specify discount — failure of sentencing judge to specify discount would not amount to error — sentencing judge in error in by not having regard to utilitarian value of guilty plea — antecedents — s 16A(2)(m) — limited recognition can be given to the position of a foreign national serving a sentence of imprisonment — offender’s immediately family in China and offender unable to talk to children for two years — sentencing judge in error by not considering this evidence — parity — where marked disparity of sentence between co-offenders giving rise to a justifiable sense of grievance, sentence should be reduced notwithstanding that reduced sentence not otherwise within the permissible range of sentencing options — appeal allowed — offender resentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment with 4 year and 6 month non-parole period
The CSD acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as First Australians and recognises their culture, history, diversity and their deep connection to the land. We acknowledge that we are on the land of the traditional owners and pay respects to Elders past and present.

© 2023 The National Judicial College of Australia (NJCA). Powered by

Privacy Policy|Terms and Conditions

top-arrow